<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lack of Leadership?</title>
	<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/</link>
	<description>Tell The Whole Damn World, This Is Blog Territory!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: abercrombie milano</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-3316</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 00:49:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-3316</guid>
					<description>Thanks i like your blog very much , i come back most days to find new posts like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks i like your blog very much , i come back most days to find new posts like this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ragnarok</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1370</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1370</guid>
					<description>Sir,

I'm almost positive that Tedford will start Longshore in the bowl game.  I couldn't say whether that decision gives Cal the best chance of winning, but that's what, as fans, we'll have to live with.

I'm disappointed that you're withdrawing your support from the program.  We're obviously experiencing what I hope is a small downturn within a larger upswing of fortune, but we'll need lots of support, both from donors and common fans alike, if Cal is to maintain its heightened position in the college football landscape.

I do think your characterization of our support as 'irrational' is a gross misstatement.  We do support our university and its football program, it's true, but we do not hold Tedford or the other coaches blameless for this team's collapse.  Rather, instead of of calling for firings and attempting to coach the team from our couches, we hope to provide a somewhat grounded evaluation of the team, with the obvious caveat that we don't attend practices or have inside medical information, so we can only speculate as to the reasons why certain decisions were made.  In continuing to support Tedford, we understand that while we don't always understand or agree with all of his decisions, we also recognize that he's forgotten more about football than we will ever know, and that Cal football with Tedford is far more successful today than it ever would have been without him.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sir,</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m almost positive that Tedford will start Longshore in the bowl game.  I couldn&#8217;t say whether that decision gives Cal the best chance of winning, but that&#8217;s what, as fans, we&#8217;ll have to live with.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m disappointed that you&#8217;re withdrawing your support from the program.  We&#8217;re obviously experiencing what I hope is a small downturn within a larger upswing of fortune, but we&#8217;ll need lots of support, both from donors and common fans alike, if Cal is to maintain its heightened position in the college football landscape.</p>
	<p>I do think your characterization of our support as &#8216;irrational&#8217; is a gross misstatement.  We do support our university and its football program, it&#8217;s true, but we do not hold Tedford or the other coaches blameless for this team&#8217;s collapse.  Rather, instead of of calling for firings and attempting to coach the team from our couches, we hope to provide a somewhat grounded evaluation of the team, with the obvious caveat that we don&#8217;t attend practices or have inside medical information, so we can only speculate as to the reasons why certain decisions were made.  In continuing to support Tedford, we understand that while we don&#8217;t always understand or agree with all of his decisions, we also recognize that he&#8217;s forgotten more about football than we will ever know, and that Cal football with Tedford is far more successful today than it ever would have been without him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: It's The Truth</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1369</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1369</guid>
					<description>I said this in another blog, but it is worth reposting here in light of the irrational support for Tedford.

There is far too much undeserved appreciation for Tedford. A great coach can become a bad coach. The fact is that Tedford did an incredibly terrible job coaching this year. And he should be fiercely challenged for that. Especially his juvenile decision to let Nate ruin the season, much as he allowed Ayoob to less than two years ago.

And I question the notion that Tedford ever was that great of a coach. He never led Cal to the heights that the team was capable of. With the amount of Talent present on the team, both this year and years past, he has been a colossal FAILURE.

If he plays Longshore in the Armed Forces Bowl I’ll have no choice but to withdrawal my substantial donations to the program. Is this really what we as a program and school want? I assure you I am not the only donor who has taken this stance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I said this in another blog, but it is worth reposting here in light of the irrational support for Tedford.</p>
	<p>There is far too much undeserved appreciation for Tedford. A great coach can become a bad coach. The fact is that Tedford did an incredibly terrible job coaching this year. And he should be fiercely challenged for that. Especially his juvenile decision to let Nate ruin the season, much as he allowed Ayoob to less than two years ago.</p>
	<p>And I question the notion that Tedford ever was that great of a coach. He never led Cal to the heights that the team was capable of. With the amount of Talent present on the team, both this year and years past, he has been a colossal FAILURE.</p>
	<p>If he plays Longshore in the Armed Forces Bowl I’ll have no choice but to withdrawal my substantial donations to the program. Is this really what we as a program and school want? I assure you I am not the only donor who has taken this stance.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HydroTech</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1367</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1367</guid>
					<description>CA Pete, you're right, I didn't mention Longshore and I can't really disagree with your assessment of him.  I did mention Forsett, and like you, agreed that he doesn't seem to get the team very fired up despite his solid performances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>CA Pete, you&#8217;re right, I didn&#8217;t mention Longshore and I can&#8217;t really disagree with your assessment of him.  I did mention Forsett, and like you, agreed that he doesn&#8217;t seem to get the team very fired up despite his solid performances.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HydroTech</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1366</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1366</guid>
					<description>Ben, yeah, pushing players to realize their leadership potential is possible and not a bad idea, but as you said there is a fine line between doing that and trying to get someone to be who they're not.  Tedford did drop a quote a few weeks back to the media saying how he would never ask players to be someone they aren't because he's not that type of guy.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ben, yeah, pushing players to realize their leadership potential is possible and not a bad idea, but as you said there is a fine line between doing that and trying to get someone to be who they&#8217;re not.  Tedford did drop a quote a few weeks back to the media saying how he would never ask players to be someone they aren&#8217;t because he&#8217;s not that type of guy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HydroTech</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1365</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1365</guid>
					<description>Fred, your statements are valid.  But the whole loyalty arguments fail to address the possibility that maybe Longshore (as much as he fumbles or as ineffective as he is in the 4th quarter) is STILL the better option than Kevin Riley.  It sure doesn't appear like it to our amateur eyes, but maybe, just maybe Tedford knows and sees some stuff which we don't.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not quite advocating that Longshore should be in, but I'm just saying that JT's actions can also be interpreted in another way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fred, your statements are valid.  But the whole loyalty arguments fail to address the possibility that maybe Longshore (as much as he fumbles or as ineffective as he is in the 4th quarter) is STILL the better option than Kevin Riley.  It sure doesn&#8217;t appear like it to our amateur eyes, but maybe, just maybe Tedford knows and sees some stuff which we don&#8217;t.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not quite advocating that Longshore should be in, but I&#8217;m just saying that JT&#8217;s actions can also be interpreted in another way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred Mueller</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1364</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1364</guid>
					<description>I'm convinced Longshore has the physical attributes to be a top QB, in college and the pros. But emotionally? Maybe not. As for why Cal fell apart halfway through the season, it's the same reason as last year. Tedford insists on keeping Nate in the games, NO MATTER WHAT! If Nate fumbles, he stays in. If he throws a few interceptions... oh, well. If Nate's performance sucks... he ain't goin' nowhere. If he's injured? Well... can he still stand up? Can he throw the ball? Yes? Then he stays in the game! Backup QB? We don't need no stinking backup QB! Uh... yes, we do... at times. Tedford shows far too much loyalty to Longshore. He should show more to the rest of the team, the fans and the school. There's no valid reason for keeping Nate in the game when he's playing like crap. If I were a high school QB, Cal would be the last school I would consider, if the starting QB is only a year or two ahead of me! I'd never get to play unless the starter was seriously (and I mean SERIOUSLY) injured. In my opinion, Tedford should be ashamed of himself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m convinced Longshore has the physical attributes to be a top QB, in college and the pros. But emotionally? Maybe not. As for why Cal fell apart halfway through the season, it&#8217;s the same reason as last year. Tedford insists on keeping Nate in the games, NO MATTER WHAT! If Nate fumbles, he stays in. If he throws a few interceptions&#8230; oh, well. If Nate&#8217;s performance sucks&#8230; he ain&#8217;t goin&#8217; nowhere. If he&#8217;s injured? Well&#8230; can he still stand up? Can he throw the ball? Yes? Then he stays in the game! Backup QB? We don&#8217;t need no stinking backup QB! Uh&#8230; yes, we do&#8230; at times. Tedford shows far too much loyalty to Longshore. He should show more to the rest of the team, the fans and the school. There&#8217;s no valid reason for keeping Nate in the game when he&#8217;s playing like crap. If I were a high school QB, Cal would be the last school I would consider, if the starting QB is only a year or two ahead of me! I&#8217;d never get to play unless the starter was seriously (and I mean SERIOUSLY) injured. In my opinion, Tedford should be ashamed of himself!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: California Pete</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1360</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1360</guid>
					<description>You fail to mention two players, who by their mere place on the field, occupy key leadership positions: Nate Longshore and Justin Forsett. 

Who really knows what the inside-the-huddle dynamics are, but my guess is that Nate's always loose and joking-around style works great when the team is winning, but comes up far short during adversity--especially when he himself is not coming through with the clutch plays to win ballgames. (Indeed, it was that contrasting, desperate competitive fire at the end of the OSU game, rather than efficiency or overall quality of play, that has made Riley a quick favorite among many fans such as myself.)

And Forsett. I'm not sure I've ever seen a more inspiring leader-by-example in my three decades of watching Cal football. His performance against Arizona sits right there next to Marshawn's last year against Washington and, back in the day, Russell White's game at UCLA in 1991. Yet somehow, Forsett's example failed to ignite the rest of the offense. Why? The only explanation I can come up with are distractions based in the passing game; Nate and his receivers just couldn't get on the same page, and it infected the rest of the offense the entire second half of the season. Here's hoping that Forsett runs the ball at least 30 times in Fort Worth, and that Nate's stat line ends up something like 14-20, 170 yards, 2 TDs, O INTs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You fail to mention two players, who by their mere place on the field, occupy key leadership positions: Nate Longshore and Justin Forsett. </p>
	<p>Who really knows what the inside-the-huddle dynamics are, but my guess is that Nate&#8217;s always loose and joking-around style works great when the team is winning, but comes up far short during adversity&#8211;especially when he himself is not coming through with the clutch plays to win ballgames. (Indeed, it was that contrasting, desperate competitive fire at the end of the OSU game, rather than efficiency or overall quality of play, that has made Riley a quick favorite among many fans such as myself.)</p>
	<p>And Forsett. I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever seen a more inspiring leader-by-example in my three decades of watching Cal football. His performance against Arizona sits right there next to Marshawn&#8217;s last year against Washington and, back in the day, Russell White&#8217;s game at UCLA in 1991. Yet somehow, Forsett&#8217;s example failed to ignite the rest of the offense. Why? The only explanation I can come up with are distractions based in the passing game; Nate and his receivers just couldn&#8217;t get on the same page, and it infected the rest of the offense the entire second half of the season. Here&#8217;s hoping that Forsett runs the ball at least 30 times in Fort Worth, and that Nate&#8217;s stat line ends up something like 14-20, 170 yards, 2 TDs, O INTs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1354</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1354</guid>
					<description>Would you really like to know why the season has gone so terrible?  Well, would you?!?  Simple, Tedford lied, and Cal football died! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Would you really like to know why the season has gone so terrible?  Well, would you?!?  Simple, Tedford lied, and Cal football died! <img src='http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1353</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/12/06/lack-of-leadership/#comment-1353</guid>
					<description>Hmmm, this makes me re-think my comments in the &quot;Chipped Bone&quot; post.  I have two thoughts.  

1) Would it be appropriate for the coaches to approach players individually and help them evolve into a particular type of leader, especially if the team needed one?  I realize some players will never become certain types of leaders, but maybe they need to be pushed to realize themselves.  All part of becoming a better football player, right?

2) Looking through this perspective really highlights the difference in the latter halves of the past two seasons.  The 2006 team struggled at times as well, but it never seemed to be hopeless, and they overcame their challenges.  Unfortunately, it didn't happen this year, and I'm now even more concerned about the Armed Forces Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hmmm, this makes me re-think my comments in the &#8220;Chipped Bone&#8221; post.  I have two thoughts.  </p>
	<p>1) Would it be appropriate for the coaches to approach players individually and help them evolve into a particular type of leader, especially if the team needed one?  I realize some players will never become certain types of leaders, but maybe they need to be pushed to realize themselves.  All part of becoming a better football player, right?</p>
	<p>2) Looking through this perspective really highlights the difference in the latter halves of the past two seasons.  The 2006 team struggled at times as well, but it never seemed to be hopeless, and they overcame their challenges.  Unfortunately, it didn&#8217;t happen this year, and I&#8217;m now even more concerned about the Armed Forces Bowl.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

