<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UCLA Post-Game Thoughts</title>
	<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Tell The Whole Damn World, This Is Blog Territory!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: gucci bags online</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-4160</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:17:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-4160</guid>
					<description>46.in which there are many rare animals such as komodo dragons 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>46.in which there are many rare animals such as komodo dragons
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: abercrombie uk</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-3597</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:14:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-3597</guid>
					<description>Nice post Amazing, I found your site on Bing looking around for something completely unrelated and I really enjoyed your site. I will stop by again to read some more posts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice post Amazing, I found your site on Bing looking around for something completely unrelated and I really enjoyed your site. I will stop by again to read some more posts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: abercrombie and fitch uk</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-3578</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:11:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-3578</guid>
					<description>You’re the best, thanks for the awesome article. I’m having troubles subscribing to your blogs feed. Thought I’d let you know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You’re the best, thanks for the awesome article. I’m having troubles subscribing to your blogs feed. Thought I’d let you know.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: abercrombie london</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-3304</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 00:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-3304</guid>
					<description>I think am just having some problems with subscribing to RSS feed here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think am just having some problems with subscribing to RSS feed here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert E. Jackson</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-937</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:30:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-937</guid>
					<description>Your fears are no stretch HydroTech.  In fact they are solidly founded in reality.  If Tedford fails to deliver the Rose Bowl (now almost impossible to attain) he could be on the firm hot seat going into next season.  He has had a long time now to get this team where it needs to be and he seems incapable of delivering.  His refusal to be flexible and unpredictable on offense of late have cost this team dearly.  His refusal to relieve his Defensive Coordinator for incompetence has been telling of his 'I am the decider' demeanor.  If Tedford heeds the concerns of fans and does as we say I think he has a bright future here.  However, if he continues in his dictatorial style he could be in store for yet another popular revolution in Berkeley!

Hear The People - Fire Gregory!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Your fears are no stretch HydroTech.  In fact they are solidly founded in reality.  If Tedford fails to deliver the Rose Bowl (now almost impossible to attain) he could be on the firm hot seat going into next season.  He has had a long time now to get this team where it needs to be and he seems incapable of delivering.  His refusal to be flexible and unpredictable on offense of late have cost this team dearly.  His refusal to relieve his Defensive Coordinator for incompetence has been telling of his &#8216;I am the decider&#8217; demeanor.  If Tedford heeds the concerns of fans and does as we say I think he has a bright future here.  However, if he continues in his dictatorial style he could be in store for yet another popular revolution in Berkeley!</p>
	<p>Hear The People - Fire Gregory!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HydroTech</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-936</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:08:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-936</guid>
					<description>I'm glad people think that my fears are a stretch because that leads me to believe that there is very much a strong Tedford following despite the bumps in the road.  I suppose my statement that more and more Cal fans might call for Tedford's firing if we lose 2-3 more games this season was a bit of an exaggeration but I still stand by my statement that I've noticed a small minority of Cal fans who seem to think Tedford needs to go.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m glad people think that my fears are a stretch because that leads me to believe that there is very much a strong Tedford following despite the bumps in the road.  I suppose my statement that more and more Cal fans might call for Tedford&#8217;s firing if we lose 2-3 more games this season was a bit of an exaggeration but I still stand by my statement that I&#8217;ve noticed a small minority of Cal fans who seem to think Tedford needs to go.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-935</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:57:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-935</guid>
					<description>first, lemme just say that hydrotech makes good points on the majority of the post,  however, i have to disagree that the majority of cal fans are ready to turn on tedford. losing his job for not winning two games this year? or even the losses of the past couple of years? that is ridiculous. let's not kid ourselves here. as good as our academics are and as great as a location as berkeley is, the real reason we're able to bring in top-notch recruits is because of tedford himself. 

i think the majority of cal fans still remember the years of losing seasons, the embarrassment of a 1-11 season as well as 7 straight consecutive losses to stanfurd. even current students who didn't experience those years themselves can still appreciate that kind of turn-around he's had on our football program. 

hydrotech is right, tedford's not infallible, and does protect tedford, but that single belief that the majority is ready to turn on tedford is bit of a disservice to cal fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>first, lemme just say that hydrotech makes good points on the majority of the post,  however, i have to disagree that the majority of cal fans are ready to turn on tedford. losing his job for not winning two games this year? or even the losses of the past couple of years? that is ridiculous. let&#8217;s not kid ourselves here. as good as our academics are and as great as a location as berkeley is, the real reason we&#8217;re able to bring in top-notch recruits is because of tedford himself. </p>
	<p>i think the majority of cal fans still remember the years of losing seasons, the embarrassment of a 1-11 season as well as 7 straight consecutive losses to stanfurd. even current students who didn&#8217;t experience those years themselves can still appreciate that kind of turn-around he&#8217;s had on our football program. </p>
	<p>hydrotech is right, tedford&#8217;s not infallible, and does protect tedford, but that single belief that the majority is ready to turn on tedford is bit of a disservice to cal fans.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Avinash</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-934</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:35:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-934</guid>
					<description>People who do not know what it means to suffer (everyone who arrived during the Tedford era) will never understand this. I do, but I've suffered through other teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>People who do not know what it means to suffer (everyone who arrived during the Tedford era) will never understand this. I do, but I&#8217;ve suffered through other teams.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TrumanHugh</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-933</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:19:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-933</guid>
					<description>Any talk about Tedford going (by force or on his own) is as insane as Cal always running it up the middle on first down.  We've lost two games.  Sure, they were games well within our potential, but the fact is, conference games are ALWAYS doubtful.

Anyone thinking the honeymoon is over--or that it's time to find a new coach--needs to think back just five years ago.  Do you really want to go back to losing the Big Game every year?  Losing to all but maybe one or two opponents season in and season out?

Do you really want to go back to being the unranked national doormat?!  I don't.  I like looking forward to fall Saturdays.  I like knowing that there is always a chance for something big and, even now, that the possibility remains.

Lose Jeff Tedford and we lose everything good that Cal has become.  A 11-2 (even 10-3) season?!  That's pretty tremendous considering where we'd been for so many years.

Two losses and you're complaining?!  Get over yourselves, Tedford-era arrivistes!  What we have is special, and there is no reason to believe that any of that has diminished. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Any talk about Tedford going (by force or on his own) is as insane as Cal always running it up the middle on first down.  We&#8217;ve lost two games.  Sure, they were games well within our potential, but the fact is, conference games are ALWAYS doubtful.</p>
	<p>Anyone thinking the honeymoon is over&#8211;or that it&#8217;s time to find a new coach&#8211;needs to think back just five years ago.  Do you really want to go back to losing the Big Game every year?  Losing to all but maybe one or two opponents season in and season out?</p>
	<p>Do you really want to go back to being the unranked national doormat?!  I don&#8217;t.  I like looking forward to fall Saturdays.  I like knowing that there is always a chance for something big and, even now, that the possibility remains.</p>
	<p>Lose Jeff Tedford and we lose everything good that Cal has become.  A 11-2 (even 10-3) season?!  That&#8217;s pretty tremendous considering where we&#8217;d been for so many years.</p>
	<p>Two losses and you&#8217;re complaining?!  Get over yourselves, Tedford-era arrivistes!  What we have is special, and there is no reason to believe that any of that has diminished.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: farthammer</title>
		<link>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-931</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:06:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://goldenblogs.blogsome.com/2007/10/20/ucla-post-game-thoughts/#comment-931</guid>
					<description>At least you guys have Rugby!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>At least you guys have Rugby!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

