Cal @ Oregon Analysis
Alright. Here’s a little bit of Oregon analysis to fill the bye week.
Formation
First, we’ll look at one particular play. I chose the play below because I want to show how the formation of the offense can force the defense into a favorable position for the offense. Take a look at the picture below. The formation that the offense is in (everyone excluding the two WRs) is called the Strong-I. It’s strong because the fullback is towards the same side as the tight end creating strength to one side.
There are few things to notice about this play before moving on. First, Jahvid Best is the runningback. As you probably now realized, I chose this play to look at how a certain offensive formation can benefit our outstanding freshman phenom. Second, the thing you should notice is the formation. Specifically that the two WRs, THA1 and Jordan are split as "twins" out to the weak side of the formation. This is important because if the defense plays man coverage, it puts both cornerbacks away from the strength of the play. If the defense plays zone coverage (as they are below) it also causes the secondary to shift towards the twin WR formation. What happens is that the defense has 6 defenders to the center’s left and 5 defenders to the center’s right (the Oregon defender across from Mack is shading to Mack’s left). If you were going to call a run play to the left or right, which way would you go? Remember, the defense only has 5 defenders to the strong side of the offense.
If you said to the right, good call. Tedford calls a sweep play to the right (picture below). Longshore takes the snap and tosses the ball to Best who begins running right. Not counting Mack and Best, the offense has four blockers to the right of the center (guard, tackle, tight end, and fulback) and the defense has five defenders. If every blocker takes out his defender, then Best is only responsible for making one guy miss.
But something is up. Best isn’t exactly eager to head up field (picture below). As you can see below he’s running parallel to the LOS (line of scrimmage). Furthermore, Longshore is also moving to the right to aid in protection. Normally the QBs are told to get the hell out of the way. And, for some reason Craig Stevens (tight end) on the 18 yard line is NOT engaging in a block against the Oregon linebacker. Instead he is releasing as if on a receiver route. All these are clues to the defense and you that this is NOT a regular run play.
Indeed this is NOT a run play (picture below). As you can see Best went from the 27 yardline in the picture above BACKWARDS to the 28 yardline in the picture below. He is obviously buying time, but to do what? To pass of course. Look closely at Best. He is clutching the football as if he’s a quarterback and preparing to throw. This is a trick play of the halfback pass variety. Notice that Stevens has released past the Oregon linebackers and is half way off the screen. Unfortunately, the Oregon linebackers have maintained their depth fairly well and did not "bite" on the "bait" (the toss play). Best could lob the ball over the Oregon linebackers’ heads but that is probably a bad idea. Count the defenders in the picture below. There are 8 Oregon defenders. There are 3 defenders off the screen who have maintained an umbrella coverage over the top of Stevens. Stevens is NOT open.
Best sees that Steven is not open and makes a wise decision. He tucks the ball, puts his head down, and attempts to minimize the yardage lost on the play (picture below).
While this play didn’t work because Oregon did not bite on the bait, this is still a good example of how Tedford sets up the defense. Unlike in my previous analysis where Tedford set up the Tennessee defense all within the one game itself, this play takes advantage of the tendencies Tedford has showed in ALL the prior games. What makes a great coach is one who can figure out the tendencies of the opposing coaches. What makes an excellent coach, is a coach who realizes his OWN tendencies, and builds off of them to deceive the defense. The tendency that Tedford is building off of here is his own tendency to run the ball with Best when Best comes in the game. As we all know, when Best comes in the game on offense, there is a 99.99% chance he’s going to get the ball somehow. Okay, that’s a bit of an exaggeration but you get the point. Now, Tedford knows that Belotti has watched the film of Cal’s prior games and sees that Tedford will run when Best comes in the game. All that setup from the past few games is the "bait." The calling a halfback pass trick play is the "trick." Unfortunately, the Oregon defenders did not take the bait.
Now that you know that the play was a trick play there are a few things to rethink. Looking at the pre-snap picture (first picture above), you should see that the "twin" WRs to the offense’s weak side is logical for maximizing the probability of success for this play. By putting the twins on the weak side, it keeps the defensive secondary away from the direction of the play (the toss to the right). Why do we want to do this? Because the right side is where Craig Stevens (the tight end and primary receiver - actually the only receiver) will be running his route. The twins will keep the defense to the offense’s left, and Craig Stevens will run to the deep right half of the field. If the WRs weren’t in twins and there was one on each side, that would keep the safeties centered as opposed to shifted towards the twins, as well as placing a cornerback to the side of the field that we want to throw to - bad idea.
Another thing you can’t see in the pictures (but if you have tivo or the dvd of the game you can go back and watch), is that the slot WRs run short routes and stay on the far side of the field (DJ ran a hitch and the slot WR ran some other outside route). The purpose of the short routes to the far side of the field is to try and get the defensive secondary to come down (so Stevens can go over the top) and to stay on the "twins" side of the field (and away from Stevens so can make the catch).
So the things I think that are significant to learn from this play are that (1) it was a trick play that built off of Tedford’s own tendency that he established throughout MANY games prior, and that (2) the formation of the offense influences the defense to position themselves in such a manner that the offense secretly wants them to.
Pocket Protection (of the non-latex kind)
The next thing I want to talk about is gameplanning and protection.
The first thing you should have noticed about Jeff Tedford’s playcalling during the Oregon game was that he was trying to keep the defense off balance and get the ball out of Longshore’s hands fast. Evidence of this is from the following facts. Tedford called 43 pass plays against Oregon. Of those, 4 of them were screens, 7 were play action plays, and 18 maximum protection plays. That’s 29 non-regular pass plays out of 43 (67.4%). Clearly Tedford was making a strong effort to not let Longshore get sacked by calling regular straight dropback passing plays. Screen plays get the ball out of the QB’s hands fairly quickly. Play action plays get the defense to concentrate on the runningback momentarily instead of the quarterback, and maximum protection plays is just plain ol’ protecting your QB.
Maximum protection plays are plays where the offense will keep in extra blockers (usually the runningback, and fullback, and sometimes the tight end too) to pass block.
I already told you that Tedford called 18 max protect plays in the game (out of 43 passing plays). The ABC sideline reporter dude said he talked to Tedford after Tedford came out from the halftime break, and relayed that Tedford wanted to protect Longshore even more. Tedford followed through on his promise. In the first half Tedford called 6 max protect plays. I know you guys can do math, so that means Tedford called 12 more max protect plays in the second half. Rightous.
The below three pictures is an example of a max protect play. The first picture is the pre-snap formation. Here again we see the Strong-I formation but without a twin WR set (the second WR is off the screen to the bottom).
Once the ball is snapped we see Longshore fake a handoff. But remember, we’re looking at this play because of the protection not so much the play itself. So look at the offensive line. Notice how the left side of the offensive line is moving backwards and giving up space to the defensive line as opposed to the right side of the offensive line which is creating a blocking wall parallel to the LOS. What is happening here is that Tedford is also rolling out the pocket in addition to leaving in extra blockers. It’s a little hard to tell from the pictures (the picture below and the 3rd picture further below) but Longshore rolls slightly to the right.
In conclusion, this is just a really small example of what’s Tedford was doing throughout the Oregon game. While I chose to focus on his max protection and rolling of the pocket, as I stated before, he was callings lots of playaction and screen plays to take pressure off of Longshore and get the ball out of Longshore’s hands quickly. The whole ideology behind that type of playcalling is to not get sacked, keep getting positive yardage, and keeping the defense off balance.
So far I’m in awe of Tedford’s playcalling for the Tennessee and Oregon games. When I look at the playcalling from these games I see ingenuity, purpose, and trickeration. While I realize this analysis wasn’t quite as grandeous as the previous one, I hope I was able to convey enough of my thoughts clearly to you so that you too can see what Tedford is doing out there. If not, I apologize but it’s 5:15 am and I need to sleep…



dude hydro…. i love reading these… its cool to learn new things and to see some of the thought that goes into plays that seem vanilla to us. PLS keep doing these.
Comment by danzig — October 10, 2007 @ 6:50 am
Agreed - these are awesome.
And Stevens actually caught a pass?
Comment by timote — October 10, 2007 @ 9:34 am
Hydro, great analysis yet again. I’d actually say this one was even better than the last one.
Comment by Ken Crawford — October 10, 2007 @ 9:56 am
Awesome analysis. I can’t believe you would think you weren’t able to convey your thoughts clearly. Dude that was 1000 times better than the 3 second analysis they do on the TV (even though they have the yellow pointer thingy).
Great job and keep it up.
Comment by CalBear — October 10, 2007 @ 10:47 am
I’ll join the chorus and commend you on another fine analysis. One question I have, though, concerns the role of the “twin” wideouts. I understand the rationale of getting the defense tilted away/behind the intended direction of the play call. But maybe having Jordan split out to the right would have been more effective. Jackson by himself is going to command the attention of one of the safeties, in addition to the corner. Perhaps if Jordan had run a short out pattern to the right sideline, that would have drawn up the other safety, creating an opportunity for Stevens to perhaps find space behind him near the hash. Alternatively, it would have given Best two receiver options, not just one. Since Jackson is going to draw a crowd all by himself, why not deploy your other targets elsewhere, where they’re more likely to find/exploit open space?
Then, again, who am I to question the genius of Tedford? While it didn’t work this time, it’s a well-designed play that I except we’ll see again sometime soon.
Comment by California Pete — October 10, 2007 @ 11:31 am
I feel like for play 1, that Belotti was well prepared for the halfback toss after seeing how the DB’s didn’t bite whatsoever. It’s almost as if Tedford should have called a regular sweep or screen to Jahvid in open space and let him do his own thing after making oregon think it was a halfback toss.
But Tedford could do whatever the hell he wants, and I’ll be fine with that.
Comment by nickle — October 10, 2007 @ 11:33 am
Very nice. Definitely learning more about Tedford’s playcalling style.
Comment by Rishi — October 10, 2007 @ 4:21 pm
I love these analyses, they are some of the best non-opinion material any Cal blog has produced. Please keep them coming!!! You can’t really find anything like this on wikipedia…
Idea: it looks like you have the games on your comp, by the screenshots. How about uploading/embedding some youtube vids to aid with the analysis?
Comment by Bay Area Bear — October 10, 2007 @ 8:15 pm
Thanks for the comments guys.
California Pete, I see what you’re saying. Putting RJ out right and running a short route might have gotten the safety to drop down so Stevens can go over the top. I think that’s the best case scenario, but the worst case scenario is that the safety doesn’t and then the safety maintains deep coverage on Stevens (and the cornerback on RJ could be playing a deep zone too adding to the coverage on Stevens). Alternatively, if the cornerback on RJ (if RJ was split to the offense’s right) was playing a short zone then you’d rather have RJ’s route go deeper and over the top of the cornerback thus forcing the cornerback to choose between taking away the deep route and giving up run yardage or attacking the ball carrier and possibility giving up a deep pass play. And as for putting your other options away from Jackson, you have an excellent point and if you remember my last Tennessee analysis showed that Tedford did exactly that. Now why Tedford didn’t do that in this play, I think it’s because the twin WR formation brings more to the table in terms of big-playness than giving Best a second receiver option against a non-shifted defense.
Nickel, yeah, if the defense is going to not overpursue and be overly aggressive then I would agree that the best course of action would be to just attack them from outside the hashes. Putting the ball carrier out in space forces the defense to close the space and be more aggressive (leaving open the possibility for reversing direction plays) or not close the space and allow Best room to run and be elusive.
Bay Area Bear, I simply download the torrent and take screen captures of the game. I do not have the game as a video file on my computer to splice and put up on youtube. You do have a good idea though. But for the sake of simplicity and time, right now I think I’m just going to continue using screen captures.
Comment by HydroTech — October 11, 2007 @ 2:00 am
I think am just having some problems with subscribing to RSS feed here.
Comment by abercrombie london — May 28, 2011 @ 12:40 am