Leader of the Pack?
I don’t pretend to know anything about the great state of Wisconsin other than the fact that they make some pretty good cheese, but there’s some controversy now about Brett Favre’s role in leading their team. ESPN Insider access required, by the way.
I agree with Seth Wickersham here when he writes that the way the Packers are going is no way to build a team, relying on a 17th year veteran who waffles every offseason about whether he’s going to walk away or not. Just because the guy has "earned the right to be selfish" as I’ve heard so many times, doesn’t mean that he’s not being selfish when he exercises that right. I’d say calling out your team’s front office and demanding a trade - however understandable that demand is, and even if that demand is later rescinded - is pretty selfish.
What does this have to do with our Bears? Wickersham also writes:
There’s no question it’s a bit of a stretch to compare Favre/Rodgers with Bledsoe/Brady. After all, Brady was never jobbed out of playing in the Rose Bowl because of that whiny cowboy Mack Brown, and Brady had to sit and wait for far longer during the NFL draft to hear his name called. Ergo, Rodgers >>>> Brady. Completely unbiased opinion. But if things fall apart in Green Bay this year, which seems possible with no running game, things seem to be pointing towards Rodgers getting the nod as the Packers’ starting QB. Starting next year.If I’m Aaron Rodgers, I’m working my tail off after-hours to become the leader of the young guys, exactly how Tom Brady did during his first year in New England. While every fan railed at how the Patriots were isolating Drew Bledsoe with lousy talent, Brady stayed late at the facility working with the late-rounders and undrafted free agents. They became a team within a team. When Brady took over as the starter, he believed the Pats could win with those guys. Guess what? They did.
It would be wise for Rodgers to think along those lines. After all, it’s obvious that Favre doesn’t.



