Here’s some fun from our rivals down south, via Deadspin:

Cal up twelve at half on the Bruins.  Perhaps the fact that they have more than twice the fouls as us helped out. 

Is an upset brewing?

My answer?  No.  Not a chance.  Nada.  Nada Mucho.  Nope.  Not at all.  Don’t make me laugh.  Zip.  Zilch.  No way.  No way, Jose.  No way, Jose Canseco.  No way, Nose Noseco.  No no,  No no. 

Probably not. 

But hey, if we do manage to hold onto the halftime lead (as we weren’t that other time we led UCLA at half, IIRC), it’ll be a nice victory to go out on.  

GO BEARS! 

No, I’m not talking about the 1999 comedic opus starring Brendon Frasier and Alicia Silverstone.  But instead an article from the Daily Cal.  See, I have heard rumors that in the Land Before Tedford, Cal football labored under other coaches.  I know, I know, I’m as shocked as you are.  In this Before Before time, surrounded by the misty veils of this still mostly molten planet, there was a coach so bad, a coach so evil to even name him would be to grant him full powers.  And under this He Who Shall Not Be Named, Cal football was somehow not succesful.  Somehow, we lost to our most hated rivals 7 straight years in a row.  Somehow, we nearly went an entire year without a single victory. Nary a hippie would dare live in our trees back then. 

Soon, the natives were restless.  As half-empty stands filled up with "Fire He Who Shall Not Be Named" chants (not that catchy, anymore, is it?), the Daily Cal ran a photograph of a man at a game holding a sign that said "Fire Holm- woah, almost screwed up, thank Tedford I caught myself there.  Many agreed, saying we needed to rise up as one and throw off the oppressive yoke.  P.S.  That man was my roommate, I was in that photo (in full band uniform no less), I have it somewhere on my computer and if I can find it, I’ll post it up.

Against the backdrop of these thousands and thousands of agitators, who cried out for freedom, beloved freedom, there was one man, one voice, one INSANELY CRAZY football player, who stood up to be heard.  And, after he placed pen to paper, we, as a society, were gifted and lo were better off than before. 

I present to you, FUJITA:

Part III : Defections and Attrition 

Success in college athletics is not determined solely by wins and losses, but rather by meeting and exceeding the expectations regarding those wins and losses.  Win some one year, and expectations are raised for the next.  This is the backbone of the argument against Ben Braun.

Very little was expected of his first team in 1996; they were picked to finish 8th in the Pac-10.  However, Braun surprised everyone by guiding them to the Sweet 16, and was rightly lauded for his brilliant coaching effort.  However, that season is still the high-water mark of his tenure, and the raised expectations of annual NCAA tournament entries and competing for conference championships have not been met.  Braun is still the same coach he always was, but by now, we expect more.

Expectations have also been fueled by outside forces.  Jason Kidd put the program on the national map, and the excitement surrounding the program got Haas Pavilion built.  Jeff Tedford has turned a BCS doormat into a BCS powerhouse in a few short years, and he’ll eventually get a new stadium built as well.  While Braun’s work would have been praised at Cal 20 years ago, today restless alumni are asking, ‘If the football team can succeed with lesser facilities at Cal, why can’t we have a nationally-ranked basketball team too?’  That’s a darn good question.

Are the expectations surrounding this basketball program realistic?  Is a conference championship too much to ask at a school that hasn’t won one since 1960?  How about regular appearances in the NCAA tournament?  The facilities are first-class, and the school’s setting and academics should only help attract potential recruits.  What is Cal lacking that other Pac-10 schools have?  Should it always rank behind UCLA and Arizona on the west coast?

Like it or not, the expectations at major-conference basketball schools are astronomically high.  There is no place among the top conferences for coaches who are merely ‘good’.  Those coaches area shown the door when their performace stagnates.  Take a downtrodden program and make it respectable?  Genius!  Now let’s see you turn it into a powerhouse.

Here is a current list of all of the men’s basketball coaches at BCS conference schools that have been at one school at least as long as Ben Braun has (11 years).  It’s a pretty short list.  Which names don’t belong?

Current Coaches at Same BCS-Conference School Since 1996
Jim Boeheim (Syracuse, since 1976)
Mike Krzyzewski (Duke, since 1980)
Lute Olson (Arizona, since 1983)
Jim Calhoun (Connecticut, since 1986)
Gary Williams (Maryland, since 1989)
Ben Braun (California, since 1996)
Ricardo Patton (Colorado, since 1996)
Billy Donovan (Florida, since 1996)
Tom Izzo (Michigan State, since 1996)

My first question was, ‘Who’s Ricardo Patton?’  Well, he’s a barely .500 coach, and he’s already resigned, effective at the end of this season.  Remove him, and you’re left with Braun and 7 other coaches, all of the rest of whom have won National Championships.  Not just conference championships and Final Four appearances, but the whole enchilada.  College basketball’s a ‘win or go home’ world, and most coaches end up going home.  By this measure, Cal’s patience with Braun has been quite lenient.

What do these sorts of expectations say about big-time college athletics?  Win at all costs?  If you don’t win, it doesn’t matter how well you do anything else?  Are these values held by the Universities that support such a system?  Do we fire physics professors because they fail to win a Nobel Prize?  Not that college basketball fans pay attention to such arguments, but something seems out of whack here.

Finally, I’d like to point out an article from October of 1997, a thank-you letter from an Old Blue, written at the height of Braun’s popularity.  Cal had just been to the Sweet 16, and Braun turned down Michigan to instead sign an 8-year contract extension.  The author makes some good points, and while he probably overstates his case, it’s hard to even imagine someone saying these things about Ben Braun now.  While Braun hasn’t been everything we hoped, for everything he has done, do we perhaps owe him one last chance?  Sandy Barbour seems to think so.

Also, if you didn’t read the whole article, I’d like to quote the second to last paragraph.  It’s a perfect example of the value of hindsight.

"Braun, Lavin, Montgomery. Maybe even Bibby. A generation of Pac 10 coaches with some staying power, some sincerity, a bit of integrity."

Part V : Comparisons and Conclusion